Legislature(1995 - 1996)
1995-04-20 Senate Journal
Full Journal pdf1995-04-20 Senate Journal Page 1114 SB 87 Senator Taylor requested that the reconsideration on CS FOR SENATE BILL NO. 87(FIN) am "An Act relating to the membership of the Alcoholic Beverage Control Board; relating to community local options for control of alcoholic beverages; relating to the control of alcoholic beverages; prohibiting persons from being on premises involving alcoholic beverages under certain circumstances; relating to the definition of `alcoholic beverage'; relating to purchase and sale of alcoholic beverages; relating to alcohol server education courses; relating to taxes on alcoholic beverage sales; relating to regulations limiting the hours during which a licensee may offer live entertainment; and providing for an effective date" be taken up. CS FOR SENATE BILL NO. 87(FIN) am was before the Senate on reconsideration. Senator Taylor moved that the Senate return to second reading for the purpose of rescinding its previous action in adopting Amendment No. 1. Senator Donley objected. 1995-04-20 Senate Journal Page 1115 SB 87 The question being: "Shall the Senate return to second reading for the purpose of rescinding its previous action in adopting Amendment No. 1?" The roll was taken with the following result: CSSB 87(FIN) am Return to Second to Rescind Previous Action YEAS: 18 NAYS: 2 EXCUSED: 0 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Adams, Duncan, Frank, Green, Halford, Hoffman, Kelly, Leman, Lincoln, Miller, Pearce, Phillips, Rieger, Salo, Sharp, Taylor, Torgerson, Zharoff Nays: Donley, Ellis and so, the bill was returned to second reading. Senator Taylor moved that the Senate rescind its previous action in adopting Amendment No. 1. Senator Ellis objected. The question being: "Shall the Senate rescind its previous action in adopting Amendment No. 1?" The roll was taken with the following result: CSSB 87(FIN) am Rescind Previous Action YEAS: 11 NAYS: 9 EXCUSED: 0 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Adams, Duncan, Green, Hoffman, Kelly, Miller, Pearce, Sharp, Taylor, Torgerson, Zharoff Nays: Donley, Ellis, Frank, Halford, Leman, Lincoln, Phillips, Rieger, Salo and so, the Senate rescinded its previous action. The question being: "Shall Amendment No. 1 be adopted?" The roll was taken with the following result: 1995-04-20 Senate Journal Page 1116 SB 87 CSSB 87(FIN) am Second Reading Amendment No. 1 YEAS: 10 NAYS: 10 EXCUSED: 0 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Donley, Ellis, Frank, Halford, Leman, Lincoln, Miller, Phillips, Rieger, Salo Nays: Adams, Duncan, Green, Hoffman, Kelly, Pearce, Sharp, Taylor, Torgerson, Zharoff and so, Amendment No. 1 failed. CS FOR SENATE BILL NO. 87(FIN) am was automatically in third reading. Senator Taylor moved that the Senate return to second reading for the purpose of rescinding its previous action in adopting Amendment No. 2. Senator Ellis objected. The question being: "Shall the Senate return to second reading for the purpose of rescinding its previous action in adopting Amendment No. 2?" The roll was taken with the following result: CSSB 87(FIN) am Return to Second to Rescind Previous Action YEAS: 17 NAYS: 3 EXCUSED: 0 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Adams, Duncan, Frank, Green, Halford, Hoffman, Kelly, Leman, Lincoln, Miller, Pearce, Phillips, Rieger, Sharp, Taylor, Torgerson, Zharoff Nays: Donley, Ellis, Salo and so, the bill was returned to second reading. Senator Taylor moved that the Senate rescind its previous action in adopting Amendment No. 2. Senator Donley objected. 1995-04-20 Senate Journal Page 1117 SB 87 The question being: "Shall the Senate rescind its previous action in adopting Amendment No. 2?" The roll was taken with the following result: CSSB 87(FIN) am Rescind Previous Action YEAS: 11 NAYS: 9 EXCUSED: 0 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Adams, Duncan, Green, Halford, Hoffman, Kelly, Miller, Sharp, Taylor, Torgerson, Zharoff Nays: Donley, Ellis, Frank, Leman, Lincoln, Pearce, Phillips, Rieger, Salo and so, the Senate rescinded its previous action. The question being: "Shall Amendment No. 2 be adopted?" The roll was taken with the following result: CSSB 87(FIN) am Second Reading Amendment No. 2 YEAS: 7 NAYS: 13 EXCUSED: 0 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Donley, Ellis, Frank, Pearce, Phillips, Rieger, Salo Nays: Adams, Duncan, Green, Halford, Hoffman, Kelly, Leman, Lincoln, Miller, Sharp, Taylor, Torgerson, Zharoff and so, Amendment No. 2 failed. CS FOR SENATE BILL NO. 87(FIN) am was automatically in third reading. Senator Taylor moved that the Senate return to second reading for the purpose of rescinding its previous action in adopting Amendment No. 3. Senator Ellis objected. The question being: "Shall the Senate return to second reading for the purpose of rescinding its previous action in adopting Amendment No. 3?" The roll was taken with the following result: 1995-04-20 Senate Journal Page 1118 SB 87 CSSB 87(FIN) am Return to Second to Rescind Previous Action YEAS: 17 NAYS: 3 EXCUSED: 0 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Adams, Duncan, Frank, Green, Halford, Hoffman, Kelly, Leman, Lincoln, Miller, Pearce, Phillips, Rieger, Sharp, Taylor, Torgerson, Zharoff Nays: Donley, Ellis, Salo and so, the bill was returned to second reading. Senator Taylor moved that the Senate rescind its previous action in adopting Amendment No. 3. Senator Ellis objected. The question being: "Shall the Senate rescind its previous action in adopting Amendment No. 3?" The roll was taken with the following result: CSSB 87(FIN) am Rescind Previous Action YEAS: 11 NAYS: 9 EXCUSED: 0 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Adams, Duncan, Green, Hoffman, Kelly, Leman, Miller, Sharp, Taylor, Torgerson, Zharoff Nays: Donley, Ellis, Frank, Halford, Lincoln, Pearce, Phillips, Rieger, Salo and so, the Senate rescinded its previous action. The question being: "Shall Amendment No. 3 be adopted?" The roll was taken with the following result: 1995-04-20 Senate Journal Page 1119 SB 87 CSSB 87(FIN) am Second Reading Amendment No. 3 YEAS: 8 NAYS: 12 EXCUSED: 0 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Donley, Ellis, Frank, Halford, Hoffman, Pearce, Rieger, Salo Nays: Adams, Duncan, Green, Kelly, Leman, Lincoln, Miller, Phillips, Sharp, Taylor, Torgerson, Zharoff and so, Amendment No. 3 failed. CS FOR SENATE BILL NO. 87(FIN) was automatically in third reading. The question to be reconsidered: "Shall CS FOR SENATE BILL NO. 87(FIN) "An Act relating to the membership of the Alcoholic Beverage Control Board; relating to community local options for control of alcoholic beverages; relating to the control of alcoholic beverages; prohibiting persons from being on premises involving alcoholic beverages under certain circumstances; relating to the definition of `alcoholic beverage'; relating to purchase and sale of alcoholic beverages; relating to alcohol server education courses; and providing for an effective date" pass the Senate?" The roll was taken with the following result: CSSB 87(FIN) Third Reading - On Reconsideration YEAS: 13 NAYS: 7 EXCUSED: 0 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Green, Halford, Hoffman, Kelly, Leman, Lincoln, Miller, Phillips, Rieger, Salo, Sharp, Taylor, Torgerson Nays: Adams, Donley, Duncan, Ellis, Frank, Pearce, Zharoff Duncan changed from "Yea" to "Nay". Zharoff changed from "Yea" to "Nay". 1995-04-20 Senate Journal Page 1120 SB 87 and so, CS FOR SENATE BILL NO. 87(FIN) passed the Senate on reconsideration. Senator Halford moved the effective date clause. The question being: "Shall the effective date clause be adopted?" The roll was taken with the following result: CSSB 87(FIN) Effective Date Vote YEAS: 17 NAYS: 3 EXCUSED: 0 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Adams, Duncan, Frank, Green, Halford, Hoffman, Kelly, Leman, Lincoln, Miller, Phillips, Rieger, Salo, Sharp, Taylor, Torgerson, Zharoff Nays: Donley, Ellis, Pearce and so, the effective date clause was adopted and the bill was referred to the Secretary for engrossment.